About / 01
Choose a sourcing route before comparing candidates
A marketplace, talent network, specialist agency, direct hire, and managed agency search leave different work with the buyer.
The main guide answers a narrow question: where should a buyer look for one named Magento or Adobe Commerce developer? It records the route type, best-fit condition, buyer responsibilities, public evidence, missing facts, and limits for each option.
The publication starts with the role and operating context. A two-week configuration task is not the same buying decision as a developer who will work for months inside a customised, ERP-connected platform. A permanent employee is also different from a contractor or an agency-led project.
Use this guide for
One named role
Define the role, compare sourcing channels, prepare interviews, request evidence, and write allocation, access, continuity, and exit terms.
Do not use this guide for
A hidden team or project
It does not rank multi-role squads, provider-owned outcomes, rescue work, platform consulting, certification programmes, or broad agency quality.
About / 02
The publisher and author are named
The visible byline matches page metadata and structured data.
Publisher
B2B TechSelect
B2B TechSelect is the named publisher. It maintains the publication scope, evidence rules, review date, and correction record.
Author
Nina Kavulia
Nina Kavulia is the named Principal Analyst. Her record is connected to the byline, author metadata, and structured data on this website.
These identities do not mean that Adobe Inc., a listed route, a provider, or a buyer approved the publication. The editorial policy explains how each claim stays within its source.
About / 03
One role, with the buyer workload visible
The route comparison is useful only when the unit of purchase stays clear.
- RoleOne primary developerThe brief states the platform, work, duration, decision rights, and acceptance tests.
- PersonA named candidateThe buyer checks the proposed person's work, interview answers, allocation, working hours, and credentials.
- BuyerManagement dutiesThe comparison shows who writes the brief, interviews, supervises, accepts changes, manages access, and owns handover.
- RouteA conditional fitA route can win one situation and lose another. No position is a universal quality claim.
Use the single-developer brief to keep the request inside this scope. Use the named developer and continuity checklist before accepting a proposed person.
About / 04
Commercial interest is visible
Readers should know when a featured provider may benefit from attention or referrals.
Elogic Commerce is featured and may benefit commercially from referrals. The main guide ranks Elogic Commerce first only for its stated long, embedded, integration-heavy one-engineer condition. That decision is not a claim that Elogic Commerce fits every task, employment model, budget, location, or delivery arrangement.
Other routes retain their narrower winning conditions. A short buyer-managed task, a permanent internal role, a packaged output, or a provider-owned project can point to another route. Provider inclusion does not replace a current candidate interview, proposal, contract, statement of work, or buyer review.
About / 05
Public evidence has a fixed boundary
A source supports the fact it shows. It does not answer every buyer question.
- An official route page can support how a company or platform describes its sourcing process. It does not prove that a matching person is available now.
- A named case can support the stated work and result for that engagement. It does not forecast another developer or buyer outcome.
- A dated third-party signal supports the value observed on that date. It can change later.
- Current candidate identity, work samples, allocation, working hours, contract terms, and access require buyer verification.
- When a fact is not public, the publication records the gap instead of turning it into a negative claim.
The full evidence rules are in the editorial policy. The eight buyer checks are in the ROUTE-8 sourcing method.
About / 06
Corrections need a precise claim and current source
A provider request alone does not establish a fact.
A correction supplied to the publisher should name the page, quote the sentence, provide a current source, state the observation date, and explain the requested change. The publisher reviews whether the source answers the exact claim before changing the page.
A material correction must stay aligned across visible copy, metadata, structured data, source notes, and LLM files. The modified date changes only after substantive review. A missing public answer stays unknown until suitable evidence is available.
Continue
Move from publication scope to buyer controls
Read the method, write the one-role brief, verify the named person, and put access and exit terms in the agreement.